Uniswap Founder's $650 Billion Token Burn

By  Noah Washington October 24, 2023

Image for Uniswap Founder's $650 Billion Token Burn


  • Uniswap founder Hayden Adams burned 99% of the HAY token supply, wiping out $650 billion in value, due to concerns over speculative trading of the token
  • The HAY token was originally created by Adams as a test asset, but recently became a memecoin with soaring speculative prices
  • The massive token burn led to a 300% surge in HAY price, as well as debates around tax implications and alternative actions Adams could have taken

On October 20th, Hayden Adams, the visionary founder of Uniswap, made a bold move. In a daring effort to address the growing issue of price speculation, Adams executed a massive token burn of HayCoin (HAY), a decision that had far-reaching consequences for the crypto market.

The token burn effectively wiped out a potential $650 billion from the cryptocurrency market as the entire HayCoin supply went up in flames​​. This massive reduction in circulating tokens immediately sent ripples throughout the crypto world.

The decision to initiate such an extreme token burn stemmed from mounting apprehension regarding the unanticipated trading frenzy and speculative behavior surrounding HayCoin. This token, initially created as a test asset, had transformed into a playground for speculators​​.

Origin of HAY Token

Five years ago, prior to the launch of Uniswap's revolutionary decentralized protocol, the HAY token came into existence. It was conceived primarily as a testing tool to assess the functionality of the platform. At that time, the lower gas fees allowed the mainnet to serve as an effective testnet​​.

The HAY token served a crucial purpose in the early days of Uniswap, facilitating testing and ensuring the platform's robustness. With lower gas fees prevalent at the time, it became the perfect vehicle for developers to fine-tune the system​​.

Remarkably, at its inception, Hayden Adams held over 99.9% of the HAY tokens in his wallet. He had created a minuscule test liquidity pool, which constituted only a fraction of the total supply​.

Fast forward to recent times, and the behavior of the HAY token has taken an unexpected turn. It began mirroring the speculative and volatile nature of memecoins, with prices soaring into six-figure ranges. This sudden transformation raised eyebrows and heightened concerns within the crypto community​​.

Permanent Removal from Circulation

So, what led to the decision to burn a majority of HAY tokens? It all boiled down to Adams' discomfort with owning an overwhelming majority of tokens associated with the meme-driven market. In a move that left the crypto world stunned, Adams initiated the burning process, erasing a colossal $650 billion worth of HAY tokens from existence​​.

Adams candidly expressed his sentiment that the speculative behavior surrounding HayCoin was "silly." He sought to disassociate himself from this speculation-driven narrative, and the token burn was his way of doing just that​​.

HayCoin price since 2017. Source: CoinGecko

One of the immediate consequences of the token burn was the permanent removal of these tokens from circulation. This act effectively reduced the overall supply of HAY coins, fundamentally altering the token's ecosystem​​.

The token burn had an inflationary effect on the price of HayCoin, leading to a remarkable 300% surge in its value post-burn. This surge was a direct result of the increased scarcity brought about by the reduction in token supply​.

While various sources reported slightly different figures, they all concurred on one significant point: A substantial price surge. Post-burn, HAY tokens were trading at astonishing values, with some sources indicating prices exceeding $2.5 million per token​​.

Eyebrows Raised on X/Twitter

Unsurprisingly, the token burn sparked a flurry of discussions within the crypto community. Topics ranged from potential tax liabilities to alternative actions that could have been taken instead of burning the tokens. The crypto world, as well as mainstream financial circles, was abuzz with debates and speculations​​.

One issue that attracted attention was the potential tax liability from the token burn. Some users estimated a staggering ~$128 billion in long-term capital gains taxes that could be attributed to this bold move​​.

Some see the HayCoin actions as counterintuitive. Source:X/Twitter Some see the HayCoin actions as counterintuitive. Source: X/Twitter

Hayden Adams' decision to burn the majority of HAY tokens stands out as a testament to the unpredictability of the digital asset landscape. It serves as a stark reminder of the potential for rapid transformation and the profound impact one individual can have on an entire market​​.

As the market continues to navigate uncharted waters, the full impact of Adams' decision remains to be seen. However, one thing is certain: This extraordinary move has left a lasting impression on the cryptocurrency community and the broader financial world, solidifying Adams' place as a visionary leader in the crypto space.