A Dive into the Maestro Telegram Bot Heist

By  Noah Washington November 1, 2023

Image for A Dive into the Maestro Telegram Bot Heist


  • An exploit in Maestro's contract enabled the theft of $500,000 in ETH from the Telegram bot project
  • Maestro responded quickly by freezing some operations, restricting access to tokens and committing to refunding affected users
  • The incident shows the need for enhanced smart contract security practices across the crypto ecosystem

The crypto world was rocked on Oct. 24th as news broke of a significant security breach that saw the loss of $500,000 in Ethereum (ETH) from the popular Maestro Telegram bot. Known for its status as one of the largest Telegram bot projects within the crypto ecosystem, Maestro's success was unfortunately also what made it a prime target for hackers.

What is Maestro?

Maestro provides a multi-chain sniper bot that operates across networks like BSC, ETH, Arbitrum and SRG, allowing users to quickly grab tokens during launches.

Other features include a wallet tracker to monitor balances without switching apps, a whale bot for tracking large wallet transactions on Telegram, and a buy bot for groups to collaboratively monitor token activity. Maestro also enables cross-network trading across ETH, BNB and Arbitrum using specialized bots.

The root cause of the incident was a critical vulnerability found within Maestro's Router2 contract. This particular contract was designed to handle the logistics of token swaps within the platform. Unfortunately, a flaw within the contract's design allowed attackers to make arbitrary calls to the contract, leading to unauthorized asset transfers from user accounts.

The attack resulted in the theft of over 280 ETH, equating to approximately $500,000. This substantial loss has undoubtedly left a significant impact on the affected users and the Maestro project as a whole. According to reports from PeckShield, a prominent security firm within the crypto space, the attackers transferred the stolen funds to Railgun, a cross-chain exchange platform. This move was likely a strategic effort to conceal the origins of the illicitly acquired funds.

Maestro's Response

Maestro took immediate action upon discovery of the breach. Within 30 minutes, the team replaced the compromised Router2 contract's logic with a benign counter contract, effectively freezing all router operations and halting any further unauthorized transfers.

In addition to addressing the immediate threat, Maestro is currently conducting a thorough internal review to ensure the security of its platform. As part of this review, access to tokens in liquidity pools on certain decentralized exchange (DEX) platforms such as SushiSwap, ShibaSwap and ETH PancakeSwap will be temporarily restricted.

Statement from Maestro. Source: Twitter/X

Recognizing the importance of user trust, Maestro has committed to refunding all affected users. In a statement, the team assured the community that they are working diligently to process refunds and will provide updates as soon as possible saying on X, formerly known as Twitter.

Impact on the Crypto Ecosystem

Inaccessibility of tokens in liquidity pools on certain DEX platforms is a notable consequence of this incident. This restriction was a necessary step to ensure the security of user assets during the ongoing internal review process.

This security breach has raised concerns about the safety of smart contracts in the crypto ecosystem. The Router2 contract's vulnerability highlights the potential risks associated with proxy designs that allow changes in contract logic without altering the contract address, a common feature utilized for upgradability purposes.

The security breach of the Maestro Telegram bot serves as a stark reminder of the potential risks and vulnerabilities inherent in the world of cryptocurrency. The safety and security of user assets and data should be of the utmost priority for any project operating within the crypto ecosystem. Developers and project leaders must remain vigilant and proactive in addressing any potential vulnerabilities to prevent such incidents from occurring in the future.